Wikiforrás:Kocsmafal/Archív 6
Ez egy korábbi vitákat és beszélgetéseket tartalmazó archív közösségi lap. Kérünk, ne változtasd meg a lap tartalmát. Ha fel akarsz éleszteni egy itt szereplő vitát, az aktuális vitalapon tedd. Köszönjük. |
Van itt admin?
Lagalább az azonnalizottakat meg a zoknivandálokat szemmel kéne tartani... OsvátA © Palackposta 2016. június 18., 13:34 (CEST)
- Burum aktív a naplók szerint. --Tacsipacsi (vita) 2016. július 1., 10:02 (CEST)
Elvileg. Pár napja kitakarítottam, de tény, hogy nem jövök ide mindennap. Amott sem vagyok már aktív, itt is egyre kevésbé. --Burumbátor privát admin 2016. július 1., 11:37 (CEST)
- Ha konkrétan kérsz, jövök, de nem követem magamtól. --grin ✎ 2016. július 10., 01:03 (CEST)
Ideiglenes adminság
Sziasztok! Fentebb jelezték, hogy rendbe kéne tenni a JavaScriptet a projektben. Én szívesen vállalkozom erre (és egyéb rendrakásra – első ránézésre a ProofreadPage kíván még pátyolgatást), csak ugye adminjog kell hozzá. Aki szeretné, hogy – ideiglenesen – adminná váljak, az a {{mellette}}
/{{támogatom}}
sablonnal szavazzon, akinek problémája van ezzel, az az {{ellene}}
/{{ellenzem}}
sablont használja, ugyanis lehet, hogy – grin hiányában – magyarul nem tudó Meta-szerkesztő fog adminná tenni. Ha valaki azt szeretné, hogy a rendrakás után is admin maradjak, az külön jelezze, különben vissza fogom adni a jogosultságot. --Tacsipacsi (vita) 2016. július 29., 14:37 (CEST)
- támogatom tartósan (hosszabb időre) is. Samat (vita) 2016. július 29., 16:12 (CEST)
- támogatom, naná, hosszabb időre is. --Vadaro (vita) 2016. július 29., 20:49 (CEST)
- támogatom, utána is, hiszen gyakorlatilag tényleg egyedül vagyok aktív, és én a műszaki/IT részéhez sajnos nem értek. --Burumbátor privát admin 2016. augusztus 4., 19:01 (CEST)
- támogatom a tartós bitet. –BáthoryPéter (vita) 2016. augusztus 8., 08:46 (CEST)
- Beállítottam, gratulálok, jó munkát! --grin ✎ 2016. augusztus 24., 16:56 (CEST)
- @Grin: Köszönöm szépen! Remélem, sokat segíthetek a projektnek! --Tacsipacsi (vita) 2016. augusztus 24., 18:41 (CEST)
- Már korábban is segítettél. Kösz, hogy vállaltad! --Vadaro (vita) 2016. augusztus 24., 21:13 (CEST)
Save/Publish
The Editing team is planning to change the name of the “Lap mentése” button to “Lap közzététele” and “Változtatások közzététele”. “Lap közzététele” will be used when you create a new page. “Változtatások közzététele” will be used when you change an existing page. The names will be consistent in all editing environments.[1][2]
This change will probably happen during the week of 30 August 2016. The change will be announced in Tech News when it happens.
If you are fluent in a language other than English, please check the status of translations at translatewiki.net for “Lap közzététele” and “Változtatások közzététele”.
The main reason for this change is to avoid confusion for new editors. Repeated user research studies with new editors have shown that some new editors believed that “Lap mentése” would save a private copy of a new page in their accounts, rather than permanently publishing their changes on the web. It is important for this part of the user interface to be clear, since it is difficult to remove public information after it is published. We believe that the confusion caused by the “Lap mentése” button increases the workload for experienced editors, who have to clean up the information that people unintentionally disclose, and report it to the functionaries and stewards to suppress it. Clarifying what the button does will reduce this problem.
Beyond that, the goal is to make all the wikis and languages more consistent, and some wikis made this change many years ago. The Legal team at the Wikimedia Foundation supports this change. Making the edit interface easier to understand will make it easier to handle licensing and privacy questions that may arise.
Any help pages or other basic documentation about how to edit pages will also need to be updated, on-wiki and elsewhere. On wiki pages, you can use the wikitext codes {{int:Publishpage}}
and {{int:Publishchanges}}
to display the new labels in the user's preferred language. For the language settings in your account preferences, these wikitext codes produce “Lap közzététele” and “Változtatások közzététele”.
Please share this news with community members who teach new editors and with others who may be interested.
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 2016. augusztus 9., 20:03 (CEST)
Ezek maradjanak...?
Ezek maradjanak vagy törlödjenek: Vita:Jóga szútrák, Vita:Az igázás szövétneke, Vita:Szvátmáráma/Hatha-jóga-pradípiká, Vita:Buddha élete/izé, Vita:Gheranda-Szamhitá? Apród (vita) 2016. augusztus 24., 22:55 (CEST)
Köszönöm Burumbátornak a törléseket. Apród (vita) 2016. augusztus 30., 20:33 (CEST)
Segédeszközök
Ajánlom mindenkinek a segédeszközök átnézését. Kerültek bele újak (ezek korábban mindenkinek vagy csak a Monobookot használóknak próbáltak betöltődni, a karakterbeszúró kivételével sikertelenül), emellett a meglévők is mostantól működőképesek (néhány eddig is működött, de sok használhatatlan volt). – Tacsipacsi (vita) 2016. augusztus 27., 12:48 (CEST)
Jelentkezés botgazdának
Sziasztok! @Apród: felhívására jelentkeznék botgazdának. TurkászBot feladata az általatok kért javítások lennének (ilyen jelenleg a [[File: -> [[Fájl: cseréje), de kérésre a beépített javítócsomagot is futtathatom. Ha van rá igény és tudtok a botnak feladatokat adni, akkor én vállalom azok megoldását. Bencemac A Holtak Szószólója 2016. augusztus 29., 09:11 (CEST)
- @Bencemac: Én nem látok igényt (a fájlhivatkozások magyarítása sem az szerintem – ez a sorvégi szóközök eltávolításával és a kategóriák lap aljára helyezésével együtt abba a kategóriába tartozik, amit jó, hogy el tud végezni az AWB, de csak akkor érdemes futtatni, ha valami ennél nagyobb súlyú problémát is szeretnénk orvosolni). Ettől függetlenül jó, ha van egy elérhető botgazda, akit lehet ugrasztani, ha valóban van feladat. – Tacsipacsi (vita) 2016. augusztus 29., 18:48 (CEST)
RevisionSlider
Birgit Müller (WMDE) 2016. szeptember 12., 17:08 (CEST)
Grants to improve your project
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre:
Greetings! The Project Grants program is currently accepting proposals for funding. There is just over a week left to submit before the October 11 deadline. If you have ideas for software, offline outreach, research, online community organizing, or other projects that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers, start your proposal today! Please encourage others who have great ideas to apply as well. Support is available if you want help turning your idea into a grant request.
- Submit a grant request
- Get help: In IdeaLab or an upcoming Hangout session
- Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants or Project and Event Grants
I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 2016. szeptember 30., 22:10 (CEST)
Creative Commons 4.0
Szia! A Wikimédia alapítvány megbízásából írok, hogy meghívjalak a CC BY-SA 3.0 licencről CC BY-SA 4.0 licencre való áttérés javaslatával kapcsolatos megbeszélésre. A tervezet valamennyi Wikimédia projektet érint. A konzultáció október 5-től november 8-ig tart. Reméljük, hogy visszacsatolásként számos nézőpontot és véleményt ismerhetünk meg. Ha érdekel a dolog, kérlek vegyél részt a megbeszélésen a Meta-Wiki-n. Joe Sutherland 2016. október 6., 02:19 (CEST)
Password reset
I apologise that this message is in English. ⧼Centralnotice-shared-help-translate⧽
We are having a problem with attackers taking over wiki accounts with privileged user rights (for example, admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, checkusers). It appears that this may be because of weak or reused passwords.
Community members are working along with members of multiple teams at the Wikimedia Foundation to address this issue.
In the meantime, we ask that everyone takes a look at the passwords they have chosen for their wiki accounts. If you know that you've chosen a weak password, or if you've chosen a password that you are using somewhere else, please change those passwords.
Select strong passwords – eight or more characters long, and containing letters, numbers, and punctuation. Joe Sutherland (vitalap) / MediaWiki message delivery (vita) 2016. november 14., 00:59 (CET)
Adding to the above section (Password reset)
Please accept my apologies - that first line should read "Help with translations!". Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) / MediaWiki message delivery (vita) 2016. november 14., 01:11 (CET)
New way to edit wikitext
Summary: There's a new opt-in Beta Feature of a wikitext mode for the visual editor. Please go try it out.
We in the Wikimedia Foundation's Editing department are responsible for making editing better for all our editors, new and experienced alike. We've been slowly improving the visual editor based on feedback, user tests, and feature requests. However, that doesn't work for all our user needs: whether you need to edit a wikitext talk page, create a template, or fix some broken reference syntax, sometimes you need to use wikitext, and many experienced editors prefer it.
Consequently, we've planned a "wikitext mode" for the visual editor for a long time. It provides as much of the visual editor's features as possible, for those times that you need or want wikitext. It has the same user interface as the visual editor, including the same toolbar across the top with the same buttons. It provides access to the citoid service for formatting citations, integrated search options for inserting images, and the ability to add new templates in a simple dialog. Like in the visual editor, if you paste in formatted text copied from another page, then formatting (such as bolding) will automatically be converted into wikitext.
All wikis now have access to this mode as a Beta Feature. When enabled, it replaces your existing wikitext editor everywhere. If you don't like it, you can reverse this at any time by turning off the Beta Feature in your preferences. We don't want to surprise anyone, so it's strictly an opt-in-only Beta Feature. It won't switch on automatically for anyone, even if you have previously checked the box to "Automatikusan kapcsoljon be a legtöbb új béta funkció".
The new wikitext edit mode is based on the visual editor, so it requires JavaScript (as does the current wikitext editor). It doesn't work with gadgets that have only been designed for the older one (and vice versa), so some users will miss gadgets they find important. We're happy to work with gadget authors to help them update their code to work with both editors. We're not planning to get rid of the current main wikitext editor on desktop in the foreseeable future. We're also not going to remove the existing ability to edit plain wikitext without JavaScript. Finally, though it should go without saying, if you prefer to continue using the current wikitext editor, then you may so do.
This is an early version, and we'd love to know what you think so we can make it better. Please leave feedback about the new mode on the feedback page. You may write comments in any language. Thank you.
James Forrester (Product Manager, Editing department, Wikimedia Foundation) --2016. december 14., 20:31 (CET)
Review of initial updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process
Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. Message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.
The Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. For 15 years, Wikimedians have worked together to build the largest free knowledge resource in human history. During this time, we've grown from a small group of editors to a diverse network of editors, developers, affiliates, readers, donors, and partners. Today, we are more than a group of websites. We are a movement rooted in values and a powerful vision: all knowledge for all people. As a movement, we have an opportunity to decide where we go from here.
This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve. We hope to design an inclusive process that makes space for everyone: editors, community leaders, affiliates, developers, readers, donors, technology platforms, institutional partners, and people we have yet to reach. There will be multiple ways to participate including on-wiki, in private spaces, and in-person meetings. You are warmly invited to join and make your voice heard.
The immediate goal is to have a strategic direction by Wikimania 2017 to help frame a discussion on how we work together toward that strategic direction.
Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Beginning with this message, monthly reviews of these updates will be sent to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.
Here is a review of the updates that have been sent so far:
- Update 1 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (15 December 2016)
- Introduction to process and information about budget spending resolution to support it
- Update 2 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (23 December 2016)
- Start of search for Lead Architect for movement strategy process
- Update 3 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (8 January 2017)
- Plans for strategy sessions at upcoming Wikimedia Conference 2017
- Update 4 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (11 January 2017)
- Introduction of williamsworks
- Update 5 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 February 2017)
- The core movement strategy team, team tracks being developed, introduction of the Community Process Steering Committee, discussions at WikiIndaba conference 2017 and the Wikimedia movement affiliates executive directors gathering in Switzerland
- Update 6 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (10 February 2017)
- Tracks A & B process prototypes and providing feedback, updates on development of all four Tracks
More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 2017. február 15., 21:31 (CET) • Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre • Get help
Overview #2 of updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process
Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.
As we mentioned last month, the Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve.
Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Each month, we are sending overviews of these updates to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.
Here is a overview of the updates that have been sent since our message last month:
- Update 7 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (16 February 2017)
- Development of documentation for Tracks A & B
- Update 8 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (24 February 2017)
- Introduction of Track Leads for all four audience tracks
- Update 9 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 March 2017)
- Seeking feedback on documents being used to help facilitate upcoming community discussions
More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 2017. március 9., 20:43 (CET) • Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre • Get help
We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)
- This message, "We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)", was sent through multiple channels by Gregory Varnum on 15 and 16 of March 2017 to village pumps, affiliate talk pages, movement mailing lists, and MassMessage groups. A similar message was sent by Nicole Ebber to organized groups and their mailing lists on 15 of March 2017. This version of the message is available for translation and documentation purposes
Dear Wikimedians/Wikipedians:
Today we are starting a broad discussion to define Wikimedia's future role in the world and develop a collaborative strategy to fulfill that role. You are warmly invited to join the conversation.
There are many ways to participate, by joining an existing conversation or starting your own:
Track A (organized groups): Discussions with your affiliate, committee or other organized group (these are groups that support the Wikimedia movement).
Track B (individual contributors): On Meta or your local language or project wiki.
This is the first of three conversations, and it will run between now and April 15. The purpose of cycle 1 is to discuss the future of the movement and generate major themes around potential directions. What do we want to build or achieve together over the next 15 years?
We welcome you, as we create this conversation together, and look forward to broad and diverse participation from all parts of our movement.
- Find out more about the movement strategy process
- Learn more about volunteering to be a Discussion Coordinator
Sincerely,
Nicole Ebber (Track A Lead), Jaime Anstee (Track B Lead), & the engagement support teams2017. március 18., 06:09 (CET)
Please accept our apologies for cross-posting this message. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.
On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections.
The Board of Trustees (Board) is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long-term sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. More information about this role can be found on Meta-Wiki. Please read the letter from the Board of Trustees calling for candidates.
The candidacy submission phase will last from April 7 (00:00 UTC) to April 20 (23:59 UTC).
We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates from April 7 to April 20. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki.
Once the questions submission period has ended on April 20, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to beginning on April 21.
The goal of this process is to fill the three community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The election results will be used by the Board itself to select its new members.
The full schedule for the Board elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.
- April 7 (00:00 UTC) – April 20 (23:59 UTC) – Board nominations
- April 7 – April 20 – Board candidates questions submission period
- April 21 – April 30 – Board candidates answer questions
- May 1 – May 14 – Board voting period
- May 15–19 – Board vote checking
- May 20 – Board result announcement goal
In addition to the Board elections, we will also soon be holding elections for the following roles:
- Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
- There are five positions being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.
- Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson (Ombuds)
- One position is being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.
Please note that this year the Board of Trustees elections will be held before the FDC and Ombuds elections. Candidates who are not elected to the Board are explicitly permitted and encouraged to submit themselves as candidates to the FDC or Ombuds positions after the results of the Board elections are announced.
More information on this year's elections can be found on Meta-Wiki. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the election talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.
On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation
Read-only mode for 20 to 30 minutes on 19 April and 3 May
Read this message in another language • Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data center in Dallas. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic to the secondary data center on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. On Wednesday, 3 May 2017, they will switch back to the primary data center.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for approximately 20 to 30 minutes on Wednesday, 19 April and Wednesday, 3 May. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Thursday 20 April and Thursday 4 May).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the weeks of 17 April 2017 and 1 May 2017. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (vita) 2017. április 11., 19:33 (CEST)
Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2017 elections for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.
The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 1 to 23:59 UTC May 14. Click here to vote. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2017 Board of Trustees election page on Meta-Wiki.
On behalf of the Elections Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation
2017. május 3., 21:16 (CEST)
Beta Feature Two Column Edit Conflict View
Birgit Müller (WMDE) 2017. május 8., 16:41 (CEST)
RevisionSlider
Birgit Müller (WMDE) 2017. május 16., 16:44 (CEST)
The Wikimedia movement strategy core team and working groups have completed reviewing the more than 1800 thematic statements we received from the first discussion. They have identified 5 themes that were consistent across all the conversations - each with their own set of sub-themes. These are not the final themes, just an initial working draft of the core concepts.
You are invited to join the online and offline discussions taking place on these 5 themes. This round of discussions will take place between now and June 12th. You can discuss as many as you like; we ask you to participate in the ones that are most (or least) important to you.
Here are the five themes, each has a page on Meta-Wiki with more information about the theme and how to participate in that theme's discussion:
- Healthy, Inclusive Communities
- The Augmented Age
- A Truly Global Movement
- The Most Respected Source of Knowledge
- Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem
On the movement strategy portal on Meta-Wiki, you can find more information about each of these themes, their discussions, and how to participate.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation • Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre • Get help2017. május 16., 23:08 (CEST)
On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, we are pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson elections. Please read the letter from the Wikimedia Foundation calling for candidates at on the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.
Funds Dissemination Committee
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC elections page.
Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson
The Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC Ombudsperson elections page.
The candidacy submission phase will last until May 28 (23:59 UTC).
We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates until May 28. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki. Once the questions submission period has ended on May 28, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to.
The goal of this process is to fill the five community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and the community-selected ombudsperson. The election results will be used by the Board itself to make the appointments.
The full schedule for the FDC elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.
- May 15 (00:00 UTC) – May 28 (23:59 UTC) – Nominations
- May 15 – May 28 – Candidates questions submission period
- May 29 – June 2 – Candidates answer questions
- June 3 – June 11 – Voting period
- June 12–14 – Vote checking
- June 15 – Goal date for announcing election results
More information on this year's elections can be found at the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.
Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.
On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation
2017. május 23., 23:05 (CEST)
Accessible editing buttons
You can see and use the old and new versions now. Most editors will only notice that some buttons are slightly larger and have different colors.
-
Buttons before the change
-
Buttons after the change
However, this change also affects some user scripts and gadgets. Unfortunately, some of them may not work well in the new system. If you maintain any user scripts or gadgets that are used for editing, please see mw:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons for information on how to test and fix your scripts. Outdated scripts can be tested and fixed now.
This change will probably reach this wiki on Tuesday, 1 August 2017. Please leave a note at mw:Talk:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons if you need help.--Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 2017. július 27., 18:56 (CEST)
Arany János Balladái Zichy Mihály rajzaival
Feltöltöttem ezt a könyvet szkennelve a commons:Category:Illustrations to János Arany's ballads by Mihály Zichy kategóriába. Érdemes-e a wikiforráson lapokat létrehozni rá, hogy könnyen megtalálható, lapozható és letölthető legyen? Vedd észre, hogy ez egy kalligrafikus és illusztrált könyv, ezért (az előszó kivételével) a teljes szkennelt oldalképek hasznosak, nem érdemes csak szöveges átiratot közölni. Lásd még Szerző:Arany János. – B jonas (vita) 2017. augusztus 18., 18:38 (CEST)
- Cross-postoltam a Wikipédia kocsmafalra. – B jonas (vita) 2017. augusztus 18., 18:51 (CEST)
Changes to the global ban policy
New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers
New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers
The Readers web team will be deploying a new feature this week to make it easier to download PDF versions of articles on the mobile website.
Providing better offline functionality was one of the highlighted areas from the research done by the New Readers team in Mexico, Nigeria, and India. The teams created a prototype for mobile PDFs which was evaluated by user research and community feedback. The prototype evaluation received positive feedback and results, so development continued.
For the initial deployment, the feature will be available to Google Chrome browsers on Android. Support for other mobile browsers to come in the future. For Chrome, the feature will use the native Android print functionality. Users can choose to download a webpage as a PDF. Mobile print styles will be used for these PDFs to ensure optimal readability for smaller screens.
The feature is available starting Wednesday, Nov 15. For more information, see the project page on MediaWiki.org.
Köszönjük!
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 2017. november 20., 23:07 (CET)
Mit jelent az új eszköz?
Sziasztok! Az URL-ből úgy látom, a magyar Wikiforrásban vagyok, de a fenti szövegekből nem vagyok benne biztos...
Ezt a levelet kaptam a Wikiforrástól:
„Valaki (valószínűleg te) nemrég bejelentkezett a fiókodba egy új eszközről. Ha ez te voltál, figyelmen kívül hagyhatod ezt az üzenetet. Ha nem te voltál, ajánlott megváltoztatnod a jelszavadat és ellenőrizned a fiókod aktivitását.”
Megtudhatnám, mit jelent az „új eszköz?” Hogyan dönti el a szerver? Vagy ember dönti el?
Köszönettel: Gyimhu (vita) 2017. december 15., 08:46 (CET)
Szia! Sajnos, nem tudom, csak feltételezem, hogy a rendszer olyankor küldi ezt az üzenetet, amikor azt érzékeli, hogy valaki újonnan jelentkezett be. Adott esetben ez nyilván te voltál ("Ha ez te voltál...") és a rendszer számára új eszköz az, ahonnan bejelentkezel. A helyedben nem foglalkoznék vele, de ha ez sokszor jelentkezik, esetleg fordulj Tacsipacsihoz. – Vadaro (vita) 2017. december 15., 13:40 (CET)
Ha jól értem a kódot, az IP-cím-tartományt (IPv4 esetén első 3 bájt, IPv6 esetén első 8 bájt) figyeli, sütiket nem használ – aki már megszerezte a jelszavadat, annak egy süti hamisítása gyerekjáték lenne. Természetesen nem ember nézi, hiszen az IP-címek személyes adatnak minősülnek, így csak a nagyon szükséges esetben és csak az IP-ellenőrök férnek hozzá. (A fenti szövegek egyébként a magyar Wikipédiára is megérkeztek, csak itt olyan alacsony az aktivitás, hogy az üzenetek többségét ezek teszik ki, ott meg jóval több más téma van, és talán még két kocsmafalon – egyéb és műszaki – szét is vannak szórva.) – Tacsipacsi (vita) 2017. december 15., 15:53 (CET)
AdvancedSearch
Birgit Müller (WMDE) 2018. május 7., 16:53 (CEST)
Update on page issues on mobile web
Update on page issues on mobile web
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre Hi everyone. The Readers web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.
So far, we have drafted a proposal on the design and implementation of the project. We were also able to run user testing on the proposed designs. The tests so far have positive results. Here is a quick summary of what we learned:
- The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
- Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
- Readers care about page issues and consider them important
- Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues
Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Please visit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Please leave feedback on the talk page.
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 2018. június 12., 22:58 (CEST)
Bot rights for User:Wikisource-bot
Hi. With the requirement to fix the page categorisation as notified at phab:T198470, I would like to propose to the community to have our bot run through and address the problem with the solution identified. The bot has been used to resolve issue previously on the Wikisources.
Thanks. Billinghurst (vita) 2018. július 7., 11:18 (CEST)
- @Billinghurst: I support it (and I think nobody else will, as you’re the fourth most active user on this wiki, the third most active being another global sysop), but I would like to see Hungarian edit summaries. I don’t know how can ever happen that a null edit appears in the page histories, but the summary should be internationalized in that case. —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. július 7., 22:24 (CEST)
- @Tacsipacsi This will be hard to do because of phab:T199042 request being contested and because Wikisource-bot uses standard software. But we will try. The null-edits generate new revision because of database model change and unfortunately devs do not want to made such changes server-side (they say going through bureaucratical procedures concerning software would take months if not years for that). Ankry (vita) 2018. augusztus 8., 08:33 (CEST)
@Grin: your decision? Ankry (vita) 2018. augusztus 8., 08:42 (CEST)
- @Ankry: (sigh) a short summary would have helped, the Phab tickets are pretty verbose. Anyway, if I see correctly you want to make large amounts of null edits to fix index colors, basically hacking the system because you cannot wait until the developers actually fix a bug, and in turn generate huge amounts of recentchanges. I can't quite see why it's such a big problem that we need to spam RC, it would help me to say some numbers and the real-life problems you're about to fix. Thanks! – grin ✎ 2018. augusztus 9., 17:53 (CEST)
- @Grin: Not exactly. Developers has already changed the way the page colors for index are retrieved from database. After notified that it broke things (in eg. phab:T198470), they made a workaround to keep the old behaviour (the workaround is active, so the colors should be OK now). However they expect the workaround to be dropped some day and the old method of retrieving page status from the database (colors) become unsupported. As the support for the new method requires database change, they do not want to make it server side, so some day all (almost all?) pages in the Page namespase would require to be edited. As hu.ws has about 1500 pages in the Page namespace, that is the upper limit of the number of edits to be expected. This can be done in few hours, but I would like to avoid flooding RecentChanges. So even temporary bot flag is OK for this job. And this is not urgent, it may be done in few weeks or months. But waiting too long or expecting that all the pages will be edited soon while making other changes is not a good idea, IMO. If the change can be made by an already existing hu.ws bot, it is also OK. I can be contacted to provide instructions (on some wikis the changes were actually made by other bots). You can see the exanmple changes the bot makes in its recent edit history on other wikis, eg here. Note also, that this is the 2nd time when similar thing happens (null edits requirement); the previous was few years ago. And nobody can say that it will not happen in future. Ankry (vita) 2018. augusztus 9., 18:44 (CEST)
- @Ankry: Thank you for your excellent summary, I support your bot flag. – grin ✎ 2018. augusztus 10., 09:41 (CEST)
- @Grin: Not exactly. Developers has already changed the way the page colors for index are retrieved from database. After notified that it broke things (in eg. phab:T198470), they made a workaround to keep the old behaviour (the workaround is active, so the colors should be OK now). However they expect the workaround to be dropped some day and the old method of retrieving page status from the database (colors) become unsupported. As the support for the new method requires database change, they do not want to make it server side, so some day all (almost all?) pages in the Page namespase would require to be edited. As hu.ws has about 1500 pages in the Page namespace, that is the upper limit of the number of edits to be expected. This can be done in few hours, but I would like to avoid flooding RecentChanges. So even temporary bot flag is OK for this job. And this is not urgent, it may be done in few weeks or months. But waiting too long or expecting that all the pages will be edited soon while making other changes is not a good idea, IMO. If the change can be made by an already existing hu.ws bot, it is also OK. I can be contacted to provide instructions (on some wikis the changes were actually made by other bots). You can see the exanmple changes the bot makes in its recent edit history on other wikis, eg here. Note also, that this is the 2nd time when similar thing happens (null edits requirement); the previous was few years ago. And nobody can say that it will not happen in future. Ankry (vita) 2018. augusztus 9., 18:44 (CEST)
Done bot flag assigned. – grin ✎ 2018. augusztus 10., 09:48 (CEST)
- Thanks, grin. The bot has finished this job, finding two broken pages: Oldal:Budenz-Szinnyei_-_Finn_nyelvtan.djvu/46 and Oldal:Budenz-Szinnyei - Finn nyelvtan.djvu/61. This problem is tracked in Phab:T201506. Ankry (vita) 2018. augusztus 10., 14:53 (CEST)
Addition of huWS to global bots
Above I have added a bot request, as this wiki is not within the global bot project, per list m:Special:WikiSets/2. Would the community consider opting in to the global bots, so that when we have Wikisource-wide fixes for mw:Extension:ProofreadPage that is possible to organise the bots to do the jobs within Phabricator, and simply get the fix in place. Billinghurst (vita) 2018. július 7., 11:19 (CEST)
- I can support this, but ProofreadPage-related fixes should not be performed by global bots (except, of course, if bot flag is also requested locally, like now). The Meta policy you linked to clearly states that only interlanguage link maintenance and double redirect fixing is in scope of global bots. You can start an RfC on Meta if you want to change this. —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. július 7., 22:30 (CEST)
Global preferences are available
Global preferences are now available, you can set them by visiting your new global preferences page. Visit mediawiki.org for information on how to use them and leave feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
2018. július 10., 21:19 (CEST)
Consultation on the creation of a separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS
(Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre)
Sziasztok,
Annak a megváltoztatását készítem elő, hogy ki szerkesztheti a mindenki által használt CSS/JS lapokat. (Az olyan lapokról van szó, mint a MediaWiki:Common.css
vagy a MediaWiki:Vector.js
, amiknek a kódja minden olvsó és szerkesztő böngészőjében végrehajtódik.) Jelenleg minden adminisztrátor képes erre, ami egy súlyos és szükségtelen biztonsági kockázatot jelent. Nemsokára egy kisebb, erre a célra létrehozott csoport veszi át ezt a feladatot. A helyi szerkesztőközösség döntheti el, ki kerül bele ebbe a csoportba, így nem jelent nagy változást a számotokra. Ha többet szeretnétek megtudni, vagy visszajelzésetek van, a konzultáció Metás oldalán megtehetitek. Különösen azok figyelmébe ajánlom, akik a CSS/JS kód karbantartásával vagy az adminválasztások szabályozásával foglalkoznak.
Köszönöm!
Tgr (talk) 2018. július 12., 10:45 (CEST) (a globális üzenetküldő szolgáltatással)
New user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS
(Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre)
Sziasztok!
Az olvasóink és szerkesztőink biztonsága érdekében a CSS-/JavaScript-oldalak szerkesztéséhez való jogot a jövőben máshogy kezeljük. (Ezek az olyan oldalak, mint a MediaWiki:Common.css
vagy a MediaWiki:Vector.js
, amik olyan kódot tartalmaznak, amit az oldalt meglátogató felhasználók böngészője végrehajt.)
Bevezettünk egy új szerkesztői csoportot, az interface-admin
-t.
Négy hét múlva csak ennek a csoportnak a tagjai tudnak majd nem saját CSS-t és JS-t szerkeszteni (vagyis olyan oldalakat, amik .css
vagy .js
végződésűek, és vagy a MediaWiki:
névtérben vannak, vagy egy másik szerkesztő allapjai).
A változtatás okairól bővebben itt olvashatsz.
Kérlek, vegyétek fel az új csoportba azokat, akiknek fontos a CSS-/JS-szerkesztés képessége. (Ez ugyanúgy megy, mint az új adminisztrátoroknál: a helyi bürokraták vagy az intézők tudják beállítani.) Ez egy veszélyes jogosultság; egy rosszindulatú szerkesztő vagy a szerkesztői fiókot feltörő hacker sokkal kártékonyabb dolgokat tehet vele, mint ami egy sima adminisztrátori hozzáféréssel lehetséges. Lehetőleg csak olyan felhasználóknak adjátok meg, akiknek tényleg szüksége van rá, akikben a közösség megbízik, és akik betartják az alapvető jelszó- és számítógép-biztonsági szabályokat (erős jelszót használnak, nem használják ugyanazt a jelszót több oldalon, ha lehet, kétfaktoros bejelentkezést használnak, nem telepítenek kétes eredetű szoftvert a gépükre, és használnak vírusirtót, ha az adott operációs rendszeren ez bevett dolog).
Köszönöm!
Tgr (talk) 2018. július 30., 15:08 (CEST) (a globális üzenetküldő szolgáltatással)
Editing of sitewide CSS/JS is only possible for interface administrators from now
(Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre)
Hi all,
as announced previously, permission handling for CSS/JS pages has changed: only members of the interface-admin
(felületadminisztrátorok) group, and a few highly privileged global groups such as stewards, can edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css or .js that is either in the MediaWiki: namespace or is another user's user subpage). This is done to improve the security of readers and editors of Wikimedia projects. More information is available at Creation of separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS. If you encounter any unexpected problems, please contact me or file a bug.
Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 2018. augusztus 27., 14:39 (CEST) (via global message delivery)
Read-only mode for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October
Read this message in another language • Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data centre. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic to the secondary data center on Wednesday, 12 September 2018. On Wednesday, 10 October 2018, they will switch back to the primary data center.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop when we switch. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Wednesday, 12 September and Wednesday, 10 October. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Thursday 13 September and Thursday 11 October).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the weeks of 10 September 2018 and 8 October 2018. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Johan(WMF) (talk)
2018. szeptember 6., 15:33 (CEST)
The GFDL license on Commons
This has been posted here because your wiki allows local file uploads. Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre.
Commons will no longer allow uploads of photos, paintings, drawings, audio and video that use the GFDL license and no other license. This starts after 14 October. Textbooks, manuals and logos, diagrams and screenshots from GFDL software manuals that only use the GFDL license are still allowed. Files licensed with both GFDL and an accepted license like Creative Commons BY-SA are still allowed.
There is no time limit to move files from other projects to Commons. The licensing date is all that counts. It doesn't matter when the file was uploaded or created. Every wiki that allows local uploads should check if bots, scripts and templates that are used to move files to Commons need to be updated. Also update your local policy documentation if needed.
The decision to allow files that only have a GFDL license, or not allow them, is a decision all wikis can make for themselves. Your wiki can decide to continue allowing the files that Commons will no longer allow after 14 October. If your wiki decides to continue to allow files after 14 October that Commons will no longer allow those files should not be moved to Commons. — Alexis Jazz, distributed by Johan using MassMessage
2018. szeptember 20., 20:11 (CEST)
ProofreadPage configuration
@Tacsipacsi, Grin: While trying to create pages in the main namespace using the standard ProofreadPage <pages> tag, I noticed that your wiki is missing two standard ProofreadPage templates:
The first one is more critical and is used to show page links. Its content generally depends on how one wishes the links to be shown. In may be
- just empty (to not show any links)
- some code showing links on left margin (eg. in mul:, ru:, sv:, en:, fr: (in en/fr it depends on some .js displaying code)
- some code showing the links inside text (in pl:; we have also a gadget/tab switch that shows/hides the links)
The second one makes it more convenient to automatically create main namespace pages based on some standard header template.
Also, it is often convenient to redirect the templates to Template namespace and use (semi)protection to control whether a non-admin advanced user can make changes to them.
Could you, please, create them, or at least the first one (MediaWiki:Proofreadpage pagenum template)? I think, you can copy-paste the code from a choosen wikisource; even if it does not work es expected, it will not break anything here.
Also, I noticed that there is no translator field in the index form definition. It might be useful. May I suggest adding it? Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 26., 21:49 (CEST)
- @Ankry: I’ve created the page number, although it currently collapses with the text (this can be fixed by adding a <div> with some left margin, or by adding a CSS rule to Sablon:Oldal/style.css once T205583 is fixed). I have no idea for the header template, so I left it untouched, but asked for others’ opinion below. I can add the translator parameter, but just to make sure, I asked that below as well. If nobody is against, I will add it (except if I forget about it ;) ). —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:04 (CEST)
- @Tacsipacsi: Thanks. Overlapping may be fixed by inline styling or by the styling added to the header template. Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:13 (CEST)
- Also, I think, you can look at the bottom of ru:MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template to see how they define styling for the <pages> tag. Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:20 (CEST)
- @Ankry: Wrapping <pages> tags with inline-styled <div>s is a solution, but it’s quite inconvenient to place extra code on all pages using this tag. Adding an opening tag at the bottom of the header template without closing it later is rather hackish; I wouldn’t like to implement that. A few weeks don’t make a difference, I hope the Phabricator task will be resolved soon, as it’s a trivial change. —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:44 (CEST)
- @Tacsipacsi: Exactly. That is why i suggest to put the inline style or class selection into the MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template as ru.ws do. The style may be choosen then using the {{{header}}} (header=###) parameter value. Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:52 (CEST)
- @Ankry: Exactly what? I wrote I don’t like to insert unbalanced HTML into the header template. It’s not a reason to insert unbalanced HTML into the header template. ;) —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:55 (CEST)
- You do not like relying on MediaWiki closing it? Me too :) Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:58 (CEST)
- @Ankry: Exactly what? I wrote I don’t like to insert unbalanced HTML into the header template. It’s not a reason to insert unbalanced HTML into the header template. ;) —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:55 (CEST)
- @Tacsipacsi: Exactly. That is why i suggest to put the inline style or class selection into the MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template as ru.ws do. The style may be choosen then using the {{{header}}} (header=###) parameter value. Ankry (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:52 (CEST)
- @Ankry: Wrapping <pages> tags with inline-styled <div>s is a solution, but it’s quite inconvenient to place extra code on all pages using this tag. Adding an opening tag at the bottom of the header template without closing it later is rather hackish; I wouldn’t like to implement that. A few weeks don’t make a difference, I hope the Phabricator task will be resolved soon, as it’s a trivial change. —Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:44 (CEST)
Megválaszolandó kérdések magyarul
- A ProofreadPage segítségével digitalizált, majd a <pages> címke segítségével a fő névtérbe beillesztett lapok (pl. Ázsiai titkok, ázsiai emberek/Előszó) tetején megjeleníthető egy fejlécsablon (ennek számos paramétere van: előző/következő/aktuális fejezet, oldalszámok stb.). Mi legyen benne? Kell egyáltalán nekünk? (Ha nem csinálunk semmit, akkor a <pages> header attribútumának megadásakor csúnya piros link keletkezik, de azt elhagyva nincs probléma. A piros link figyelmeztetheti a szerkesztőket, hogy ne kérjenek fejlécet, mert úgyse működik.)
- Van bárkinek ellenvetése az ellen, hogy berakjak egy fordító paramétert is az indexlapokon (pl. Index:Ossendowski - Ázsiai titkok, ázsiai emberek.djvu) megjelenő táblázatba, illetve a szerkesztéskor megjelenő űrlapra? – Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. szeptember 27., 00:04 (CEST)
Words hyphenated across pages in Wikisource are now joined
Hi, this is a message by Can da Lua as discussed here for wikisource communities
The ProofreadPage extension can now join together a word that is split between a page and the next.
In the past, when a page was ending with "concat-" and the next page was beginning with "enation", the resulting transclusion would have been "concat- enation", and a special template like d:Q15630535 had to be used to obtain the word "concatenation".
Now the default behavior has changed: the hyphen at the end of a page is suppressed and in this case no space is inserted, so the result of the transclusion will be: "concatenation", without the need of a template. The "joiner" character is defined by default as "-" (the regular hyphen), but it is possible to change this. A template may still be needed to deal with particular cases when the hyphen needs to be preserved.
Please share this information with your community.
MediaWiki message delivery (vita) 2018. szeptember 30., 12:28 (CEST)
Modulhomokozó
Van ilyen? Nemethyd (vita) 2018. október 3., 09:56 (CEST)
- A Wikiforrás névtérben nincs és nem is lehet, mert modul csak a Modul névtérben lehet (azaz más névtérben nem lehet Lua-kódot elhelyezni úgy, hogy az valóban működjön is). A Wikiforrásban még semmilyen konvenció nincs a homokozásra, de szerintem nyugodtan lehet követni a Wikipédia ajánlását, és Modul:Homokozó/ kezdetű névvel létrehozni a homokozólapokat. Vagy akár a végleges címen is lehet próbálkozni, hiszen ott sem okoz semmilyen problémát, amíg más lapok nem használják a modult. – Tacsipacsi (vita) 2018. október 3., 19:50 (CEST)
- Köszönöm akkor próbálkozom egy homokozóval Nemethyd (vita) 2018. október 3., 21:50 (CEST)
The Community Wishlist Survey
The Community Wishlist Survey. Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can post technical proposals from now until 11 November. The communities will vote on the proposals between 16 November and 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)2018. október 30., 12:06 (CET)
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
Hello,
In a few weeks the Readers web team will be changing how some templates look on the mobile web site. We will make these templates more noticeable when viewing the article. We ask for your help in updating any templates that don't look correct.
What kind of templates? Specifically templates that notify readers and contributors about issues with the content of an article – the text and information in the article. Examples like Template:Unreferenced or Template:More citations needed. Right now these notifications are hidden behind a link under the title of an article. We will format templates like these (mostly those that use Template:Ambox or message box templates in general) to show a short summary under the page title. You can tap on the "Learn more" link to get more information.
For template editors we have some recommendations on how to make templates that are mobile-friendly and also further documentation on our work so far.
If you have questions about formatting templates for mobile, please leave a note on the project talk page or file a task in Phabricator and we will help you.
Köszönjük!
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 2018. november 13., 20:34 (CET)
Community Wishlist Survey vote
The Community Wishlist Survey. Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. The communities have now posted a long list of technical proposals. You can vote on the proposals from now until 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)2018. november 22., 19:13 (CET)
Advanced Search
Johanna Strodt (WMDE) (talk) 2018. november 26., 12:02 (CET)
Selection of the Wikisource Community User Group representative to the Wikimedia Summit
Dear all,
Sorry for writing in English and cross-posting this message.
The Wikisource Community User Group could send one representative to the Wikimedia Summit 2019 (formerly "Wikimedia Conference"). The Wikimedia Summit is a yearly conference of all organizations affiliated to the Wikimedia Movement (including our Wikisource Community User Group). It is a great place to talk about Wikisource needs to the chapters and other user groups that compose the Wikimedia movement. For context, there is a short report on what happened last year. The deadline is short and to avoid the confusing vote on the Wikisource-I mailing list of last year, we created a page on meta to decide who will be the representative of the user group to the Wikimedia Summit.
The vote will be in two parts:
- until December 7th, people can add their name and a short explanation on who they are and why they want to go to the summit. Nomination of other people is allowed, the nominated person should accept their nomination.
- starting December 7th, and for a week, the community vote to designate the representative.
Please feel free to ask any question on the wikisource-I mailing list or on the talk page.
For the Wikisource Community User Group, Tpt (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
New Wikimedia password policy and requirements
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
The Wikimedia Foundation security team is implementing a new password policy and requirements. You can learn more about the project on MediaWiki.org.
These new requirements will apply to new accounts and privileged accounts. New accounts will be required to create a password with a minimum length of 8 characters. Privileged accounts will be prompted to update their password to one that is at least 10 characters in length.
These changes are planned to be in effect on December 13th. If you think your work or tools will be affected by this change, please let us know on the talk page.
Köszönjük!
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 2018. december 6., 21:03 (CET)
Wikisource Community User Group representative vote
Dear all,
Sorry for writing in English and cross-posting this message.
Following the previous message, the vote for the representative of the Wikisource Community User Group to the Wikimedia Summit 2019 is now open.
There is two great candidates on page on meta to decide who will be the representative of the user group to the Wikimedia Summit. You can support a candidate now. All active Wikisource users can vote. The vote is ending on December 14, 2018.
Feel free to ask any question on the wikisource-I mailing list or on the talk page.
Köszönjük!
For the Wikisource Community User Group, Tpt (talk) December 8, 2018 at 18:53 (UTC)
Invitation from Wiki Loves Love 2019
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
Love is an important subject for humanity and it is expressed in different cultures and regions in different ways across the world through different gestures, ceremonies, festivals and to document expression of this rich and beautiful emotion, we need your help so we can share and spread the depth of cultures that each region has, the best of how people of that region, celebrate love.
Wiki Loves Love (WLL) is an international photography competition of Wikimedia Commons with the subject love testimonials happening in the month of February.
The primary goal of the competition is to document love testimonials through human cultural diversity such as monuments, ceremonies, snapshot of tender gesture, and miscellaneous objects used as symbol of love; to illustrate articles in the worldwide free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and other Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects.
The theme of 2019 iteration is Celebrations, Festivals, Ceremonies and rituals of love.
Sign up your affiliate or individually at Participants page.
To know more about the contest, check out our Commons Page and FAQs
There are several prizes to grab. Hope to see you spreading love this February with Wiki Loves Love!
Kind regards,
Imagine... the sum of all love!
--MediaWiki message delivery (vita) 2018. december 27., 11:12 (CET)
FileExporter beta feature
A new beta feature will soon be released on all wikis: The FileExporter. It allows exports of files from a local wiki to Wikimedia Commons, including their file history and page history. Which files can be exported is defined by each wiki's community: Please check your wiki's configuration file if you want to use this feature.
The FileExporter has already been a beta feature on mediawiki.org, meta.wikimedia, deWP, faWP, arWP, koWP and on wikisource.org. After some functionality was added, it's now becoming a beta feature on all wikis. Deployment is planned for January 16. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test the FileExporter, please activate it in your user preferences. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 2019. január 14., 10:41 (CET)
No editing for 30 minutes on 17 January
2019. január 16., 19:40 (CET)
Talk to us about talking
The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
- First, sign up your group here.
- Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
- Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
- When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
- What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
- What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
- What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
- What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
- Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.
Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.
Trizek (WMF) 2019. február 21., 16:01 (CET)
FONTOS: Adminok aktivitásának felülvizsgálata
Sziasztok! Egy globális közösségi konszenzussal elfogadtunk egy irányelvet a „magasabb jogok” (adminisztrátor, bürokrata stb.) megvonásáról 2013-ban. Az irányelv szerint az intézők felülvizsgálják az adminisztrátorok aktivitását a Wikimédia Alapítvány összes olyan wikijén, ami nem rendelkezik saját inaktivitási irányelvvel. Tudomásunk szerint ezen a wikin nincs formális procedúra az inaktív fiókok „magasabb jogainak” megvonására. Ez azt jelenti, hogy az intézők fogják megtenni ezt az adminaktivitás átnézése lapon leírtak szerint.
Megállapítottuk, hogy a következő szerkesztők megfelelnek az inaktivitási kritériumoknak (nem szerkesztettek és nem volt naplózott műveletük az elmúlt 2 évben):
- BáthoryPéter
Ezek a szerkesztők hamarosan kapnak egy értesítést, hogy közösségi megbeszélést kell indítaniuk, ha meg akarják tartani bizonyos vagy összes jogukat. Ha nem válaszolnak, a magasabb jogaikat meg fogják vonni az intézők.
Ha viszont a közösség szeretne egy saját felülvizsgálati procedúrát létrehozni, ami leváltja a globálisat, más döntést kíván hozni ezekről az inaktív jogtulajdonosokról, vagy már van egy irányelve, amit nem vettünk észre, kérjük, értesítsétek az intézőket a Metán, hogy tudjuk, hogy ne folytassuk a jogok átnézését ezen a wikin. Köszönjük, --MarcoAurelio (vita) 2019. március 5., 20:55 (CET)
- I removed admin flag. Einsbor (vita) 2019. április 12., 11:35 (CEST)
Read-only mode for up to 30 minutes on 11 April
2019. április 8., 12:56 (CEST)
Wikimedia Foundation Medium-Term Plan feedback request
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
Update on the consultation about office actions
Hello all,
Last month, the Wikimedia Foundation's Trust & Safety team announced a future consultation about partial and/or temporary office actions. We want to let you know that the draft version of this consultation has now been posted on Meta.
This is a draft. It is not intended to be the consultation itself, which will be posted on Meta likely in early September. Please do not treat this draft as a consultation. Instead, we ask your assistance in forming the final language for the consultation.
For that end, we would like your input over the next couple of weeks about what questions the consultation should ask about partial and temporary Foundation office action bans and how it should be formatted. Please post it on the draft talk page. Our goal is to provide space for the community to discuss all the aspects of these office actions that need to be discussed, and we want to ensure with your feedback that the consultation is presented in the best way to encourage frank and constructive conversation.
Please visit the consultation draft on Meta-wiki and leave your comments on the draft’s talk page about what the consultation should look like and what questions it should ask.
Thank you for your input! -- The Trust & Safety team 2019. augusztus 16., 10:03 (CEST)
New tools and IP masking
Sziasztok,
a Wikimédia Alapítvány két, a változtatások ellenőzésével és a vandalizmus és zaklatás kezelésével kapcsolatos dolgon szeretne változtatni. Egyrészt jobbá akarjuk tenni a rossz szerkesztések kezelésére szolgáló eszközöket. Másrészt meg akarjuk erősíteni a nem regisztrált felhasználók adatvédelmét, hogy az IP címüket ne láthassa mindenki. Az IP-címeket nem rejtjük el, amíg nincsenek jobb járőreszközök.
Van egy előzetes elképzelésünk, hogy milyen eszközökre lenne szükség, és milyen változásokat hozna, ha kevesebben látnák az IP címeket, de szeretnénk a ti véleményeteket is hallani. A projektről részletesebben olvashattok a Metán, és ott tudtok hozzászólni is. Jelezzétek az igényeiteket, hogy jobb vandalizmus-, spam- és zaklatásszűrő eszközöket adhassunk nektek!
Ha nem beszéltek angolul, hozzászólhattok a saját nyelveteken is.
Johan (WMF)2019. augusztus 21., 16:19 (CEST)
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started
Hello,
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.
How can you help?
- Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
- Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
- Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.
We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!
-- Kbrown (WMF) 2019. szeptember 30., 19:14 (CEST)
Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project
Segíts lefordítani a saját nyelvedre
Hello. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
- Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
- Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
- Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
- Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
- Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
- Put things in logical and useful places
- Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
- Eliminate clutter
- Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
- Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
- Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
- No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Köszönjük! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)
2019. október 16., 09:15 (CEST)
Community Wishlist 2020
Megnyílt a 2020-as közösségi kívánságlista! Ezen a kívánságlistán dönthetnek a közösségek arról, hogy min dolgozzon jövőre a Community Tech csapata. Mindenkit bátorítunk, hogy küldjön be javaslatokat a november 11-i határidőig, vagy fűzzön konstruktív megjegyzéseket más javaslatokhoz.
Idén kizárólag a kisebb projektekkel (Wikikönyvek, Wikiszótár, Wikidézet, Wikiforrás, Wikiegyetem, Wikifajok, Wikivoyage, Wikihírek) foglalkozunk. Szeretnénk ezeknek a projekteknek segíteni, és értelmes fejlesztéseket végezni különböző közösségeknek. Ha ezen projektek bármelyikének tagja vagy, biztatunk a kívánságlistán való részvételre! Javaslatok beküldéséhez lásd az irányelveket a kívánságlista lapján. Bármilyen nyelven írhatsz javaslatokat, mi lefordítjuk őket. Köszönjük, és izgatottan várjuk a javaslataidat!